- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:18:17 +0000
- To: duerst@w3.org, "thierry michel" <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-translators@w3.org>, <gerald@w3.org>
At 21:34 +0900 8/03/01, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Forbidding to translate WDs,... was discussed earlier, but rejected.
>Translating something at an early stage allows people to get more
>familiar with what we do early, to comment,...
I understand your point Martin.
>As for publishing something that is not right, we do that all the time.
>While we can ask translators to upgrade in place, to remove old versions,
>to add additional warnings,... if there is a new version, and so on,
>WE OURSELVES never add any warning for an old WD, nor do we remove it.
I agree but we serve always the latest version by default. Maybe we
can add a comment in the example
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/translation-example.html
In the CASE of a WD, We can have a RED comment, large size font...
"This is a working DRAFT subject to change"
--
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
http://www.w3.org/QA/
--- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 08:21:07 UTC