Re: xmllink conformance

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 12:18:59 -0800
• To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
• Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970127121851.006dfff0@pop.intergate.bc.ca>

At 11:32 AM 1/27/97 -0800, Terry Allen wrote:
>So I think this spec needs a conformance section indicating what
>an xmllink-spec-compliant xmllink app MUST do.  (There is a recent
>RFC on vocabulary for conformance.) 

Terry's right.  I'm not sure we should have conformance language
(maybe the syntax is all we need?) but at least we should kick the
idea around... I'll make sure we get some formal debating points on
this. - Tim

Received on Monday, 27 January 1997 15:20:17 UTC