- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 12:35:55 -0800
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 03:09 PM 1/27/97 EST, lee@sq.com wrote: >If it is something that could also be used with HTML (say, at least >in principle) Yes, and SGML in general, too. Let's not forget that. XML-LINK is (yawn) boring. I thought XHL sounded enough like XML that it was obvious that they were in the same family; and was contemplating having XDL or XFL or something for phase 3. Oh well. -T.
Received on Monday, 27 January 1997 15:37:13 UTC