- From: Terry Allen <tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 11:32:09 -0800 (PST)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
There is certainly a lot in this spec. And the way is left free for xmllink apps to handle linking by other means, too. If I am to publish XML docs (or perhaps more properly XML+xmllink docs), I'll probably want to know whether the requesting app can handle the specified linking mechanisms - or else the requesting app will need to be able to discover what linking mechanisms are used - in the likely case that not all apps can handle all possible mechanisms. So I think this spec needs a conformance section indicating what an xmllink-spec-compliant xmllink app MUST do. (There is a recent RFC on vocabulary for conformance.) In what I see here, only negative conformance is indicated (for the TITLE, BEHAVIOR, and RENDER atts). A related issue is that interdependence of att values is specified ("If the reference type is TEI, the HREF must be a TEI locator"), but this cannot be determined by SGML parsing; is an xmllink supraSGML syntax checker contemplated? Regards, Terry Allen Fujitsu Software Corp. tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com "In going on with these experiments, how many pretty systems do we build, which we soon find outselves obliged to destroy?" - Benjamin Franklin A Davenport Group Sponsor: http://www.ora.com/davenport/index.html
Received on Monday, 27 January 1997 14:32:49 UTC