- From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 96 10:47:23 CST
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:14:24 -0500 Eve L. Maler said: >At 05:23 PM 10/29/96 CST, Michael Sperberg-McQueen wrote: >>So, I think the answer to the original question is, Yes, there >>should be an XML parameter entity to indicate whether the DTD >>given is a full DTD (as for SGML) or a partial DTD not intended >>to make the document valid (probably, in practice, intended only >>to make it well-formed). > >(PI, not parment, right?) People who are making ad hoc document Right. Processing instruction, not parameter entity. I shouldn't draft postings when I'm tired. Eve is surely right that claiming validity is probably more useful and to the point than saying 'DTD is complete/incomplete'; also right to suggest the default should be 'no validity claimed'. -Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 1996 11:50:04 UTC