- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@HiWAAY.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 20:57:47 -0600
- To: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@arbortext.com>
- CC: Charles@sgmlsource.com, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Eve L. Maler wrote: > > I've been just watching the tennis match on this issue, and my allegiance > switches with every mail message. :-) Nonetheless, one small comment... > > Perhaps they're learning that it's a good idea to use the DOCTYPE > declaration because they're pointing to various *different* HTMLs. A > DOCTYPE declaration of <!DOCTYPE foo SYSTEM> tells you nothing other > than (repetitiously) the root element's name, whereas an FPI at least > points you to a specific intended DTD. > > Eve I agree. But if a compromise is needed, that one at least preserves some form of compatibility even if only gestural. I don't understand this tennis match. It looks simple enough. Me, I prefer to point to a real DTD and receive an instance that tells me what is intended. Then at least I can crank up the right browser. len
Received on Monday, 28 October 1996 21:57:55 UTC