W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > October 1996

Re: ERB decisions on A.17, B.9, and other questions

From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 22:00:01 GMT
To: John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu
Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <32709fb8.15829285@mail.alink.net>
On Sun, 20 Oct 1996 15:18:56 -0400 (EDT), John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu wrote:

>The SDATA keyword, in very common practice, means "This is a name for
>the character, a name that needs conversion for whatever output device
>you've got at hand."  The prescribed effect (at least in the ESIS
>world) is to mark that name as distinct from ordinary document
>content.  You can certainly live without that distinction if you don't
>mind unreliable hacks like saying "anything in square brackets is
>really a character name".

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, John, but I would like to point out
that "[name]" doesn't have to be a hack. We could have an XML notation, declared
formally for all element types with data content, in which "[name]" was *always*
a character name. As long as the ESIS content is unchanged for all systems,
there is no need for text to be declared to the parser as SDATA.
--
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
           13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
  International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
 Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management
--
Received on Sunday, 20 October 1996 18:02:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:04 UTC