- From: Deborah A. Lapeyre <dlapeyre@mulberrytech.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 08:22:39 -0800 (PST)
- To: Murray Altheim <murray@spyglass.com>
- cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
I heard James and I canot refute what he says. But I am one of the voices asking loudly for FPIs. I don't ask that anything be done with their little insides (semantically, syntactically, or anything else you can think of). I would be content if they could be viewed as one long silly-looking string that we use in a character for character match. I would not find that match hard to do. Therefore I'm assuming that it must be the catalog part that is difficult. Is it the SGML Open catalog that is the problem? That catalog was intended to be interchageable and complete (well...), not simple. Would a simplification of it help? And (for those of us whose dragon-book years are very long ago and far away) what is the difficult part? --Debbie Lapeyre ======================================================================= Deborah A. Lapeyre Phone: 301-231-6933 Mulberry Technologies, Inc. Fax: 301-231-6935 6010 Executive Blvd. Suite 608 E-mail: dlapeyre@mulberrytech.com Rockville, MD USA 20852 =======================================================================
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 1996 11:22:56 UTC