- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@HiWAAY.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 07:42:01 -0600
- To: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- CC: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca, tbray@textuality.com, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Jon Bosak wrote: > > [Len Bullard:] > > | It would seem the first issue would be if designing > | XML requires one to also design styles and hyperlinks. > | For SGML, those are separate issues traditionally. > | Why in XML are they not? > > You cannot have a high-end delivery vehicle for the Web unless you have > > 1. Structure > > 2. Hyperlinking > > 3. Presentational semantics. Not at issue. Structure has been resolved with some issues remaining that need a Technical Corrigendum for SGML. Hyperlinking is to be discussed next and the presentational semantics are the last item. Ok so far? > These have been our three explicit deliverables since we started this > activity. > > Please read the activity statement. I have read the activity statement. Why is that an obstacle to a reasonable discussion of the questions I am raising? len
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 1996 08:41:51 UTC