- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 05:45:31 +0000
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Do we have our first erratum? Brian -------- Original Message -------- Subject: XML-Reference Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:04:38 -0500 (EST) Resent-From: www-rdf-comments@w3.org Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:04:18 +0100 From: Frank Kaufer <kaufer@web.de> Reply-To: Frank Kaufer <kaufer@web.de> To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org> Hello, there's a nonessential error in the RDF-Schema-REC, which references a XML-Recommendation of 1988, nice. And though it's clear, that 1998 is meant, why not the latest XML-Rec of 2004 or at least the Second Edition of 2000 like in RDF/XML? In "RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema", W3C-Rec, 10.02.2004: [XML] Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation, 10-February-1988, Section 3.2 Element Type Declarations http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html#elemdecls Regards, Frank Kaufer
Received on Friday, 5 March 2004 00:46:59 UTC