- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:38:08 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Do we have our first erratum? I think we should say that the 1988 reference is genuine, but not widely known. Pat > >Brian > > >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: XML-Reference >Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:04:38 -0500 (EST) >Resent-From: www-rdf-comments@w3.org >Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:04:18 +0100 >From: Frank Kaufer <kaufer@web.de> >Reply-To: Frank Kaufer <kaufer@web.de> >To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org> > > >Hello, > >there's a nonessential error in the RDF-Schema-REC, which references a >XML-Recommendation of 1988, nice. >And though it's clear, that 1998 is meant, why not the latest XML-Rec of >2004 or at least the Second Edition of 2000 like in RDF/XML? > > >In "RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema", W3C-Rec, >10.02.2004: > >[XML] >Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation, 10-February-1988, >Section 3.2 Element Type Declarations >http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html#elemdecls > >Regards, >Frank Kaufer -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:38:11 UTC