W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: arch comments

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:02:15 -0500
Message-ID: <4047B577.4060606@acm.org>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

I will be sending some comments.  One immediate comment is that the one 
RDF reference cites M&S rather than any of the new batch of specs, and 
needs to be updated.  We might also want to think about a suggestion as 
to what form that reference should take.  If there is only going to be 
one RDF reference, and that to a single document as now, my call would 
be it ought to cite Concepts (just as the one reference to OWL is to the 
Language Reference), but people may have other ideas.


Brian McBride wrote:

> Looks like we are going to be late getting WG comments in on the  tag 
> architecture document.  I had a quiet word with the Tag co-chair and he 
> suggested we could ask for an extension.
> Having committed that the WG would respond, I'd prefer that we honour 
> that commitment.  Thus I propose to ask for an extension till 27 Mar and 
>  we approve comments by email, if possible.
> I suggest that folks send in personal comments asap and we get WG 
> endorsement of them by email.  We have comments from Graham (thanks gk).
> I propose:
>   - any proposed WG comments to list by Friday 12th March.
>   - email discussion following week
>   - approve 19th Mar if there is no controversy
> Brian
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:01:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:27 UTC