Re: arch comments

Sounds OK to, but there's a small wrinkle.  I intend to send as personal 
comments any that are deemed out of scope for RDFcore to present.  Can the 
requested delay apply also to my personal comments?

#g
--

At 08:25 03/03/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>Looks like we are going to be late getting WG comments in on the  tag 
>architecture document.  I had a quiet word with the Tag co-chair and he 
>suggested we could ask for an extension.
>
>Having committed that the WG would respond, I'd prefer that we honour that 
>commitment.  Thus I propose to ask for an extension till 27 Mar and  we 
>approve comments by email, if possible.
>
>I suggest that folks send in personal comments asap and we get WG 
>endorsement of them by email.  We have comments from Graham (thanks gk).
>
>I propose:
>
>   - any proposed WG comments to list by Friday 12th March.
>   - email discussion following week
>   - approve 19th Mar if there is no controversy
>
>Brian

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2004 13:18:08 UTC