- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 19:23:43 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > > > Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> >> >> Brian McBride wrote: >> >>> b) advice to the CG about what to do about postponed issues >> >> >> >> >> Personally I prefer not to discuss postponed issues (for new recs?) >> until we've got this one in the bag. >> >> As HP rep the position I represented was we did not need to resolve >> these issues in this standardization round. For the next few weeks >> that remains the position I wish to represent. > > > I was not clear. I was not proposing we discuss resolutions of the > issues, but suggestions to the CG of how/whether these issues might, at > some point in the future be resolved. For example, the WG might > recommend to the CG that some issues are higher priority than others. > > Is that a discussion you feel able to contribute to? I am not sure that we can have a procedural only discussion - I guess if I am unconfortable I will just stay quiet - and my silence should not be interpreted as assent. For instance, I decided to not reply to Grahams msg on the postponed issues despite disagreeing with it. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 14:24:34 UTC