- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:53:04 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 17:08 19/02/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >Graham Klyne wrote: > >[...] > >>I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), and if >>a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we may consider >>something more collective. >>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html > >That looks plausible to me. Anyone unhappy? > >Graham, does it help to have more folks chip in with "me too" messages at >this stage? Probably not. Better, I think, to debate the case coherently than make it a political issue. Having Jeremy and Pat supporting my comments will, I think, be enough to show it's not an isolated comment. We're not at the stage of IETF last-call yet. On the other hand, if people have additional comments to make that add substantially to the debate, that's always welcome. (But please bear in mind that this specification is in its final stages of being nailed down, so any comments should be addressed specifically to the specification rather than to broader issues, preferably with suggestions for improvement.) If Pat agrees with the specific wording in [1] cited above (Jeremy already has), then I'm ready to send it off. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 14:59:28 UTC