- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:25:18 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 17:08 19/02/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >>Graham Klyne wrote: >> >>[...] >> >>>I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), >>>and if a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we >>>may consider something more collective. >>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html >> >>That looks plausible to me. Anyone unhappy? >> >>Graham, does it help to have more folks chip in with "me too" >>messages at this stage? > >Probably not. Better, I think, to debate the case coherently than >make it a political issue. Having Jeremy and Pat supporting my >comments will, I think, be enough to show it's not an isolated >comment. We're not at the stage of IETF last-call yet. > >On the other hand, if people have additional comments to make that >add substantially to the debate, that's always welcome. (But please >bear in mind that this specification is in its final stages of being >nailed down, so any comments should be addressed specifically to the >specification rather than to broader issues, preferably with >suggestions for improvement.) > >If Pat agrees with the specific wording in [1] cited above (Jeremy >already has), then I'm ready to send it off. Yes, go ahead. pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 18:25:21 UTC