Re: Heads up: RFC2996bis, possible problem for RDF

Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]

> 
> I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), and if 
> a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we may consider 
> something more collective.
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html
> 

That looks plausible to me.  Anyone unhappy?

Graham, does it help to have more folks chip in with "me too" messages 
at this stage?

Brian

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 12:10:03 UTC