- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:31:29 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 10:51 19/02/04 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>I agree with Graham that this is a potentially serious problem that we >>should nip in the bud. I also would like to be a co-signatory on the >>proposed textual changes; Graham, please include me. I particularly like >>the inclusion of the phrase " for purposes of retrieval" as it >>acknowledges that URIs have other purposes. >>Pat > >It's looking like we should make a formal comment as a WG ... what's the >timescale? A formal comment as such has no special weight in the IETF process. The URI mailing list may not be a formal IETF working group, but it is planning to make a submission for IETF publication, so I'd imagine the IETF modus operandi will be predominant. I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), and if a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we may consider something more collective. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html As for timescales: Roy mentioned requesting IETF last-call in two weeks. The IETF last-call for a non-working-group specification is 4 weeks. In practice, I expect we have a bit longer because of a forthcoming IETF meeting. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 07:47:41 UTC