- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:17:09 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <p06001f0dbc484cb16380@[10.0.100.76]>
>Pat, > >OK, I'll send an agenda for a telecon, but I wouldn't object to >cancelling if you and Eric manage to sort this out amongst >yourselves before hand. Fine with me, I'll take it up with Eric. I think others in the WG may have views on it, but we can do this by email, surely. > >Brian > > >Pat Hayes wrote: > >>>Any suggestions for agenda items for a telecon this week. >> >> >> >>Two stylistic issues concerning the documents >> >>1.. Normativity. We might want to clear up this issue noticed by >>several people > >references please Frank (referring to the Primer status): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Jan/0100.html Me: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0008.html > >about which of the 5 documents are considered normative, >>and how to explain clearly the difference in the boilerplate >>(hopefully so it makes sense: I'm certainly confused about it, for >>one. OK, so maybe the primer isnt normative and maybe test cases >>are never normative (?), but why is Vocabulary not normative? > >?? who said it isn't. Its got normative references. We did, last July http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0236 and reference there to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0164.html Cited in the change log of the Semantics document http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/#change (under 'changes since the 23 january ... , 2. Technical/editorial) Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 16:17:11 UTC