- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:32:39 +0000
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Pat, OK, I'll send an agenda for a telecon, but I wouldn't object to cancelling if you and Eric manage to sort this out amongst yourselves before hand. Brian Pat Hayes wrote: >> Any suggestions for agenda items for a telecon this week. > > > > Two stylistic issues concerning the documents > > 1.. Normativity. We might want to clear up this issue noticed by > several people references please about which of the 5 documents are considered normative, > and how to explain clearly the difference in the boilerplate (hopefully > so it makes sense: I'm certainly confused about it, for one. OK, so > maybe the primer isnt normative and maybe test cases are never normative > (?), but why is Vocabulary not normative? ?? who said it isn't. Its got normative references. And if it isn't, why are its > semantics normative? ) > > 2. Change log style. What is appropriate for a change log in the > publication document? (1) the full change log from day one or (2) the > change log since the most recently archived public release? I would vote > for the latter and beg permission to have the semantics doc brought up > to date in that regard by deleting a chunk of stuff from the change log. > > Pat >
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 06:34:10 UTC