Re: fragment identifiers

On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 06:05, Graham Klyne wrote:
[...]
> THEREFORE:
> I propose that we do not put the publication schedule and consensus already 
> developed at risk by trying to address Martin's editorial points in the 
> short period available to us.
> 
> Instead, I suggest that careful editorial work be undertaken for 
> publication in an errata document, and subsequently in a revised 
> publication of the Concepts document.

Would you please phrase that proposal in the form of a draft
response to Martin?

Then the chairs can judge whether it's consistent with
the proceedings of the WG and responsive to the comment.



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 16:38:52 UTC