- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:57:55 +0200
- To: ext Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
With regards to rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure there is IMO absolutely nothing new here. The wrapper proposal that they suggest is (a) an earlier design that we discussed in great length and (b) not the kind of solution that we should be responsible for, as it concerns the general problem of capturing contextual information of arbitrary XML fragments -- and if/when the XML community agree on a standardized solution to that problem, it will work flawlessly with our present design. I'm not the least motivated to reopen this issue. Regards, Patrick On 2003-11-07 17:06, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > This just in... > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html > > I'm noodling on whether it's sufficient new information > for me to reconsider my position on > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure > > I encourage others to do likewise. > > DanBri, perhaps we could discuss this under > 7: Document Status > 7f: Concepts > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Nov/att-0017/rdfcore-ag > enda-2003-11-07.txt >
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 03:00:12 UTC