W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: more from I18N WG

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:57:55 +0200
To: ext Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBD511A3.4B31%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

With regards to rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure there is IMO absolutely
nothing new here. 

The wrapper proposal that they suggest is (a) an earlier design that we
discussed in great length and (b) not the kind of solution that we should
be responsible for, as it concerns the general problem of capturing
contextual information of arbitrary XML fragments -- and if/when the XML
community agree on a standardized solution to that problem, it will work
flawlessly with our present design.

I'm not the least motivated to reopen this issue.



On 2003-11-07 17:06, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> This just in...
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html
> I'm noodling on whether it's sufficient new information
> for me to reconsider my position on
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure
> I encourage others to do likewise.
> DanBri, perhaps we could discuss this under
> 7: Document Status
> 7f: Concepts
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Nov/att-0017/rdfcore-ag
> enda-2003-11-07.txt
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 03:00:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:26 UTC