- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 12:17:39 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 16:54 07/11/03 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >Let me suggest that I adopt the following simplified convention, which I >think will be sufficient. A name (as now) is a URI or typed literal. A >vocabulary is a set of names. The vocabulary OF a graph is the set of >names that occur in the graph as the subject, object or predicate of a >triple. Interpretations are defined on a vocabulary, usually that of a graph. This reminds me of a concern I had some time ago about the class rdfs:Literal being indistinguishable from rdfs:Resource [1]. (Er, what I claimed was LV being indistinguishable from IR.) Does the new convention help this? #g -- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0324.html Comment labelled: [For discussion] Section 1.3, para 5 about LV: ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Sunday, 9 November 2003 09:28:07 UTC