Re: more from I18N WG

At 09:06 07/11/03 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>This just in...
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html
>
>I'm noodling on whether it's sufficient new information
>for me to reconsider my position on
>http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure
>
>I encourage others to do likewise.

I don't think there's any new information there (in the first three points) 
that we didn't have when we considered this during LC.

(FWIW, I have considered my position on #rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, 
but I don't plan to say anything more unless it comes up for discussion.)

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 12:53:37 UTC