- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:49:55 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> It seems to say that the lexical form is canonicalized. Agreed, it does say that. Clicking through on the issue list from reagle-01 we see that the assumption that the lexical form is canonical is correct. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#reagle-01 click on accepted: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0021.html [[ The RDF Core WG has resolved http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0097.html item 13, to accept this issue and address it as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0151.html ]] In which we read: syntax: New text: [[ The string used as the lexical form of the XML Literal is the Exclusive XML Canonicalization [XML-XC14N]) with comments and with empty <a href=" http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718/#def-InclusiveNamespaces -PrefixList "> InclusiveNamespaces PrefixList </a> of the literal text l, i.e. the entire element content of this property element. ]] concepts new text: [[ The lexical space is the union of the set of all pairs ( string, lang ) and the set of all strings string, for which: + lang is any language identifier [RFC-3066] normalized to lowercase; + string is well-balanced, self-contained XML element content [XML]; + string is <a href=" http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718/#def-exclusive-canonical -XML "> exclusive Canonical XML </a> (with comments, with empty <a href=" http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718/#def-InclusiveNamespaces -PrefixList "> InclusiveNamespaces PrefixList </a>); + the XML document corresponding to the pair or the string is a well-formed XML document [XML] that also conforms to XML Namespaces [XML-NS]. ]]
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 03:49:49 UTC