- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:45:29 -0500
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Brian_McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Message-Id: <p05210645bae8494733ac@[10.0.100.5]>
re. issue pfps-01, I propose that we accept it, and note that it has been addressed by the following text (between **-**): The datatype map which also contains the set of all pairs of the form < http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#sss , sss>, where sss is a built-in datatype **which has well-defined lexical and value spaces and a lexical-to-value mapping and** is named sss in XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes [XML-SCHEMA2], eg decimal, string, is referred to here as XSD. ]] re. issue pfps-03, I propose that we not accept it and note that the purpose of the appendix is informative (for a certain class of readers) rather than definitive. The document states: "The editor believes that both of these descriptions, and also the closure rules described in section 4, are all in exact correspondence, but only the directly described model theory in sections 1- 3 should be taken as normative." re. issue pfps-05, I propose that we accept it and note that it is addressed by rule rdfs1 in section 4.2 of the editor's draft. (Jeremy, the cases you mention rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource rdfs:Class rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource follow from the range constraints on subClassOf, which require rdfs:Literal and rdfs:Class both to be of type class, then rule rdfs7a.) re. issue pfps-09, I propose that we accept it and address it with the text in section 3.4 of the editor's draft, viz. "RDF provides for the use of externally defined datatypes identified by a particular URIref. ... Formally, let D be a set of pairs consisting of a URIref and a datatype such that no URIref appears twice in the set, so that D can be regarded as a function from a set of URIrefs to a set of datatypes: call this a datatype map." re. issue horst-01, I propose that we accept it and address it by reference to the rule rdfs12 in the current editor's draft, together with a note that the proof of the rdfs entailment lemma will discuss issues arising in the subsequent email trail following this comment, with details to be given in a later response. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:45:39 UTC