- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 12:00:12 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Thanks Dave, Feeding http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html into http://jena.hpl.hp.com:3040/swebscrape/scrape Generates the actions in N3. Thanks. Brian At 22:04 05/05/2003 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: >Agenda: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0003.html > >Transcript: > http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-05-02 > >NOTE: Actions have been transcribed according to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html > (hence the rather long action lines) > >Roll call: > Dave Beckett > Dan Brickley > Jeremy Carroll > Mike Dean > Jan Grant > Pat Hayes > Graham Klyne > Brian McBride (chair) > Frank Manola > Eric Miller > >date: 20030502 > >Regrets: Patrick Stickler, Jos De Roo > > >Item 3: Review agenda. > No AOB > > >Item 4: Next telecon 2003-05-09 1000 Boston Time > Scribe: Jeremy Carroll > > >Item 5: Minutes of 2003-04-25 with corrections > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0361.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0363.html > Approved with correction (xmlsch-12 was postponed). > > >Item 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions > All done. > > >Item 7: RDFCore comments on OWL Reference > > Discussion of Brian's draft comments in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0002.html > > DaveB, GK, FrankM, JJC read above. Discussion of use of JosD's > comments on bnodes in#owlref-rdfcore-transitive-datatype-properties > and after discussion, Brian really wanted that to make the point. > >ACTION 20030502#1 bwm send the comments in >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0002.html as >comments from RDFCore on OWL Reference LCWD > > >Item 8: RDFCore comments on OWL AS+S > > Discussion of Jan's comments in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0291.html > Reviewed by JJC, BWM. > On 2.1 - Jan proposes to strike this comment, agreed. Jan > agreed to split typos from substantive issues and give the latter > issue IDs. Jan agreed to drop 2.2 comment on NFC. > > Discussion of 2.3.2.1 and was unclear what the intended meaning was > here. After explanation it was note that the meaning was as intended > but it wasn't clear, Jan to reword to ask WebOnt to make this "hack" > explicit, it was non-obvious. > >ACTION 20030502#2 jang send revised OWL S+AS 2.3.2.1 words to the rdfcore list > > Discussion of 4.1 and translation table - much disliked and found > difficult to use, highly opaque. > >ACTION 20030502#3 gk review 4.1 of AS&S especially the translation to >triples table, with an eye on implementation. >ACTION 20030502#4 jang split s+as comments in 0291 into editorial >substantial issues, with issue ids >ACTION 20030502#5 jjc explain point about use of (restrictions on use of >)blank nodes in OWL DL, Lite and propose a comment for OWL > > >Item 9: Status on Incoming Last Call Comments > > Skipped > > >Item 10: Issue timbl-03 > >ACTION 20030502#6 jjc Tell webont co-chairs that jjc will be dropping his >objection to removing this on friday due to lack of webont response. >ACTION 20030502#7 bwm Remind webont co-chairs about timbl-03 issue >ACTION 20030502#8 eric put timbl-03 issue on the agenda for next SWCG > >item 11: danc-04 add a trivially true predicate > > Discussion of background to this issue -- comments, xml comments, > xml schema comments and rdf comments > > PROPOSED to postpone danc-04 on the grounds that: > it's too new, too late and not sufficiently motivated, well > understood or discussed, and could be explored in later specs. > Give encouragement to try implementing this. > > prop danbri; seconded jjc; against 0; abstain: 0 > > APPROVED danc-04 postponement > >ACTION 20030502#9 bwm add danc-04 to postponed issues list >ACTION 20030502#10 danbri send the formal response on postponing danc-04 >to the comments list and submitter along with grounds for postponal. > > >Item 12: Issues vass-02 property instances > > Discussion of this comment and the general approach of the FORTH > group - a different interpretation of RDF M&S and it's open world > design principles. > > PROPOSAL in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0305.html > proposed: danbri; seconded jjc; against: 0; abstain: 0 > > APPROVED vass-02 not accepted > >ACTION 20030502#11 danbri send the formal response on non-accepting >vass-02 to the comments list and submitter using message 2003Apr/0305 with >a new example. > > >Item 13: Issues xmlsch-03 xmlsch-04 pfps-13 > > PROPOSED to clarify xmlsch-03 xmlsch-04 pfps-13 > based on the proposal to close in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0368.html > > proposed: jjc, seconded gk; against: 0; abstain: 0 > >ACTION 20030502#12 jjc update the Concepts WD with words after discussion >with PatH and GK based on 2003Apr/0368.html text > >ACTION 20030502#13 jjc send formal responses to submitters after issues >dealt with in 2003Apr/0368.html > > >Item 14: Proposed XML schema class > > Discussion of adding an rdfs:Schema to enable discover, > identification and organisation of vocabularies. Comparing this to > owl:Ontology as a solution, which has no formal semantics. > >ACTION 20030502#14 bwm allocate a formal comment ID for the rdfs:Schema issue > > PROPOSED: to accept this comment and will use owl:Ontology and will > include in the schema for RDF Schema > > proposed: bwm, seconded [missed], against: 0; abstain: ILRT (DaveB), PatH > >ACTION 20030502#15 danbri send formal responses to submitter on this issue >(after a new LC Issue ID is allocated) >ACTION 20030502#16 danbri add owl:Ontology to the RDF schema for rdfs > > >Item 15: Language tags in typed literals. > > Discussion, no consensus yet. > >ACTION 20030502#17 jjc make a proposal to the list to treat XMLLiteral >like any other datatype > > >Item 16: Issue xmlsch-01 Typed Literal Structure > > Discussed with item 15. > > >Item 17: Issue xmlsch-02 Whitespace facets > > Not reached > > > >Meeting closed. > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >This last line is explained by >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html > >swebscrape:N3:python: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py >Dave
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 06:59:47 UTC