- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:26:21 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jan Grant said: ... > Item 13: xmlsch-12 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0274.html I proposed to postpone it in this message. > With amendment: strike "sucks because". > With amendment: "the WG notes your offer of help and has asked the > coordination group to carry it forward" > PROPOSED to reject xmlsch-12 as detailed above > prop daveb; second path; against 0; abstain 0 > RESOLVED This is recorded as a resolution to reject. > > ACTION 20030425#9 bwm postponed issue for xmlsch-12 (is it the same as for -10?) This action hints it must have been a postponement. > ACTION 20030425#10 em carry xmlsch WG's offer of help wrt xmlsch-12 to semantic web coordination group > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0489.html > ACTION 20030425#11 daveb respond to xmlsch-12 The IRC http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-04-25 doesn't show it as a reject. So I'm assuming that it is the (unapproved) minutes that are in error. Dave PS (I need the postponed issue assigned URI before I can respond to xmlsch-10 or this)
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:29:21 UTC