W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

xmlsch-12 closure (was Re: Minutes of RDFCore telecon, 2003-04-25)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:26:21 +0100
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <21550.1051640781@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Jan Grant said:


> Item 13: xmlsch-12
> 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0274.html

I proposed to postpone it in this message.

>   With amendment: strike "sucks because".
>   With amendment: "the WG notes your offer of help and has asked the
> 	coordination group to carry it forward"
>   PROPOSED to reject xmlsch-12 as detailed above
>   prop daveb; second path; against 0; abstain 0

This is recorded as a resolution to reject.

> ACTION 20030425#9 bwm postponed issue for xmlsch-12 (is it the same as for -10?)

This action hints it must have been a postponement.

> ACTION 20030425#10 em carry xmlsch WG's offer of help wrt xmlsch-12 to semantic web coordination group
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0489.html
> ACTION 20030425#11 daveb respond to xmlsch-12

The IRC http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-04-25 doesn't
show it as a reject.  So I'm assuming that it is the (unapproved)
minutes that are in error.


PS (I need the postponed issue assigned URI before I can respond to
xmlsch-10 or this)
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:29:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:22 UTC