- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:38:36 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Mar 14 2003 in America/New York duration 120 minutes
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Mar 14 2003 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
1: Volunteer Scribe
2: Roll Call
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon 21 Mar 2003 1100 Boston Time
We have a telecon scheduled for 18 Mar 2003, but:
o I have another meeting I have to attend at that time
o Turnout at this weeks extra telecon was poor
o my request for another chair has met with no response
I propose therefore to cancel the extra telecon next Tuesday.
Volunteer Scribe
5: Minutes of 28 Feb 2003 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0053.html
6: Minutes of 11 Mar 2003 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION: 2002-11-01#16 danbri
team contact for publishinging LBase note
ACTION: 2003-02-14#3 em
set up a discussion between RDFCore and (x)HTML, with the objective to understand each other on the subject of RDF in HTML
ACTION: 2003-02-28#1 em
schedule tuesday teleconference for rdfcore (11th and 18th)
ACTION: 2002-02-28#2 gk
respond to Vassillis
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0063.html
ACTION: 2002-02-28#3 bwm
help respond to Karsten(sp?) question wrt collections
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0328.html
see:
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T15-49-17
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0507.html
ACTION: 2002-02-28#4 gk
follow up on the concepts implication on pfps-15
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0061.html
ACTION: 2003-02-28#6 gk
review concepts for use of term [[namespace]]
see:
http://lhttp//www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T16-27-27)
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0062.html
ACTION: 2003-02-28#7 daveB
review syntax for use of term [[namespace]]
see:
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T16-27-14
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0056.html
ACTION: 2003-02-28#8 danbri
review schema for use of term [[namespace]]
see:
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T16-27-01
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0241.html
ACTION: 2003-02-28#9 bwm
with patH review semantics for use of term [[namespace]]
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0094.html
ACTION: 2002-02-28#11 danc
danc to convey resolution of danc-01 issue to PatH
see:
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T16-39-19
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0095.html
ACTION: 2003-03-11#1 jjc
Make a proposal that abstract syntax contains canonicalized XML with comments
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0074.html
ACTION: 2003-03-11#15 bwm
Re-post boilerplate for response to comments
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0096.html
ACTION: 2003-03-11#3 bwm
Move issue rdfms-assertion to postponed
see:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion
8: XML Schema 1.1 Requirements
2003-02-14#1 daveB respond immediately to XML Schema 1.1 with a date for
" we'll get back to you"
2003-02-14#2 daveB liase with jjc to work up a response on the XML Schema
1.1 requirements
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0163.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0078.html
9: Status on Incoming Last Call Comments
Editors please note the editorial comments from the xml schema WG.
These have not been recorded in the comments list as they can
presumably be dealt with at editors discretion.
Otherwise, is the LCC comments list uptodate? VDL (aka schema)?
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#microschedule
10: Issue pfps-17,18,19,20,21
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-17
... and similar
17 is dealt with:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0503.html
and pfps has indicated that the resolution is satisfactory and for the
other docs.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0505.html
Propose:
o throughout the docs
- the term [xml namespace] be used to refer to xml namespaces
- the term [vocabulary] be used to refer to collections of names
(RDF URI References]
o the editors update their docs accordingly
o bwm responds to pfps for all these issues
11: Issues macgregor-01, macgregor-02
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-01
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02
These are now moot as indicated by suggested by jjc in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0040.html
Propose these are closed on the grounds the offending text has been removed.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
12: Issues reagle-01, reagle-02
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#reagle-01
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#reagle-02
Proposal from Jeremy:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0074.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
13: Issue williams-01
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#williams-01
Graham's proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0059.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
14: Issue pfps-03
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03
Pat's message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0069.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
15: Issue pfps-04,pfps-05,pfps-06,pfps-07,pfps-10
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-04
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-05
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-06
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-07
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-10
Pat's message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0069.html
Propose:
Accept these comments and refer pfps to the updated editors draft.
Note: I intend to have a category of pending responses where a commentor
reserves judgement on the resolution of a comment.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
16: Issue pfps-08
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-08
Pat's message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0069.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
17: Issue qu-01
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#qu-01
Propose:
Reject: When we discussed this we decided to allow rdf:_nnn
to be applied to resources other than containers, noting that the
original schema WG had omitted such a constraint.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
18: Issue qu-02
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#qu-02
Jeremy's Proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0071.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
19: Issue xmlsch-08
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-08
Dave's Proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0077.html
[[Summary: closed. explanation, no action]]
i.e. we respond agreeing that there are good reasons why its different,
indicating sensitivity to possible confusion and indicating the steps
we have taken to minimise such confusion.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
20: Issue xmlsch-09
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-09
Dave's Proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0077.html
[[Summary: closed. explanation, no action]]
Jeremy's Followup:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0079.html
[[ wouldn't be surprised
if the text could do with editorial polish on this point.]]
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
21: Issue xmlsch-10
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-10
Dave's Proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0077.html
[[closed. we don't have to do this, out of charter ??]]
Jeremy's Followup:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0079.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
22: Issue xmlsch-11
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-11
Dave's Proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0077.html
[[closed. explanation, no changes]]
Jeremy's Followup:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0079.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
23: Issue xmlsch-12
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-12
Dave's Proposal:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0077.html
Jeremy's Followup:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0079.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
24: Issue horrocks-01
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#horrocks-01
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0081.html
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:38:48 UTC