- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:40:43 +0000
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 08:25 11/03/2003 -0500, Eric Miller wrote: >ACTION: graham to review concepts for 'namespace' (context: >http://www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T16-27-27) Section 3.3: "For example, the QName datatype requires a namespace declaration to be in scope ..."; I think that's OK in the XML sense. Section 3.7: "3.7 RDF Core URI Vocabulary and Namespaces (Normative)"; I think that's in the XML sense. Section 3.7: "(conventionally associated with namespace prefix rdf:)". I think that's OK in the XML sense. Section 3.7: "these URI prefix strings correspond to XML namespaces [XML-NS] ..."; I think that's in the XML sense. Section 3.7: "Note: these namespace URIs are the same as those used in earlier RDF documents [RDF-MS] [RDF-SCHEMA]."; I think that's in the XML sense. Section 3.7: "[[[NOTE FOR REVIEWERS: Some terms in these namespaces have been deprecated..."; I think that should be "vocabularies", but the text will be removed anyway. Section 3.7: "Vocabulary terms in the rdf: namespace are listed in section 5.1 of the RDF syntax specification [RDF-SYNTAX]." This is a closer call, but I think that's in the XML sense. ... Those are all the occurrences of 'namespace' that I found. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 10:17:04 UTC