- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 04:47:57 +0000
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
The following comment was agreed, and I have sent it to the comments list
(it has not shown up though).
I point out that all the parties with a declared interest, except for Peter
Crowther, were at the meeting and agreed to this resolution.
In particular Patel-Schneider and Parsia who raised issues with the
section, and Connolly, Brickley, Eric Miller and Berners-Lee (amongst
others) for W3C (who originally raised the issue rdfms-assertion).
I have asked Crowther to endorse the resolution.
Jeremy
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RDF Concepts - section 4
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 23:07:23 +0000
From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
The Semantic Web Architecture meeting at the W3C tech plenary
resolved unanimously to this message.
We suggest that:
- section 4 is struck
- postpone rdfms-assertion
- strike other text concerning rdfms-assertion
- CG prioritise work on this issue,
co-ordinated with the TAG over URI denotation.
Jeremy Carroll.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 02:22:10 UTC