Re: Proposal to close reagle-01, reagle-02 (substantive)

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 20:40:48 +0000
• To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030306203937.02974810@localhost>

At 18:16 06/03/2003 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Brian, please prioritize discussion of this issue since
>it is critical path for WebOnt.
>
>Proposal to close reagle-01, reagle-02.
>
>Summary:
>  Use exc-c14n without comments throughout.
>  Suggest that parser should (but not SHOULD) canonicalize.

I thought we were defining the syntax and semantics of a langauge, and 
assuming a processing model.

If this will solve the webont problem, then can we say nothing at 
all?  They just have to make sure they use a canonicalising parser?

Brian

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2003 15:39:54 UTC