- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:05:01 +0200
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Summary: Decisions: "The value space of XML literals is a set of exclusively canonicalized XML" New actions: JanG review OWL Test Cases jjc clarify scope of review of OWL Test Cases em get W3c mgmt feedback on I18N issue jjc Dig out cannes minutes danc give feedback to martin dürst Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0134.html IRC: http://www.w3.org/2003/06/20-rdfcore-irc (403) http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-06-20 date: 20030620 ============ 1: scribe call for volunteer Scribe is jeremy. 2: Roll Call regrets: mike, patrick present: jjc, FrankM, bwm, DanC, JanG, DanBri Jos EMiller GrahamKlyne and PatH (very late - during schedule). 3: Review Agenda AOBs added as in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0151.html (however we ran out of time, and did not reach them) 4: Next telecon 27 Jun 2003 1000 Boston Time Volunteer Scribe: DanC volunteered, with EM agreeing to be back-up 5: Minutes of 16 May 2003 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0199.html approved 6: Minutes of 06 Jun 2003 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0067.html approved 7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2003-02-07#2 jjc ensure CONCEPTS is accurate on its use of subject/predicate/object terminology ACTION: 2002-02-28#10 jjc update concepts to reflect disposition of danc-01 ACTION: 2003-03-21#6 jjc review concepts #section-rdf-graph in light of williams-01 and circulate changes to WG ACTION: 2003-03-21#7 jjc review concetps #section-blank-nodes in light of williams-01 decision and circulate proposed changes (if any) to the wg ACTION: 2003-03-14#9 jjc Check the details of the denotation of XMLLiterals in section 3.1 of Semantics WD draft ACTION: 2003-03-28#9 jjc update Concepts in light of XML Schema LC review editorial comments ACTION: 2003-03-28#15 jjc add anchors to Concepts for def of canonicalistion, and for Impl Note ACTION: 2003-03-28#16 jjc update proposal on tex-01 ACTION: 2003-04-04#11 jjc Produce a test case for tex-01 ACTION: 2003-04-11#8 jjc editorial changes reflecting not changing namespace URI ACTION: 2003-04-11#10 jjc update CONCEPTS in light of decision pfps 22 pfps 23 ACTION: 2003-04-11#12 jjc update CONCEPTS in light of decision pfps 16 ACTION: 2003-04-11#14 jjc update CONCEPTS in light of decision williams 01 ACTION: 20030502#12 jjc update the Concepts WD with words after discussion with PatH and GK based on 2003Apr/0368.html text ACTION: 20030509#6 jjc Make typed literal changes in concepts. ACTION: 20030509#7 jjc Review concepts to make consequential changes concerning typed ACTION: 20030509#9 jjc Provide anchor for rdf:XMLLiteral to Pat Hayes ACTION: 20030509#21 jjc Updated concepts in lite of xmlsch-02 decision ACTION: 2003-05-16#5 daveb respond to commenter regarding timbl-03 decision ACTION: 2003-05-16#7 daveb update syntax document in light of timbl-03 decision ACTION: 2003-05-16#13 jjc update conepts document per xmlsch-06 ACTION: 20030606#10 jjc Ask WebOnt for clear request to RDF Core for review of OWL Test ACTION: 20030606#11 jjc integrate value space of xml literal. 8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions ACTION: 2002-11-22#5 jjc check that RDF Concepts does not allow a synonym for rdf:XMLLiteral ACTION: 20030606#7 Path to draft vass-01 response for the wg to send jjc noted that RDF Concepts *does* allow a synonym for rdf:XMLLiteral 9: Review of Owl test cases ACTION JanG review OWL Test Cases ACTION jjc clarify scope of review of OWL Test Cases 10: value space of rdf:XMLLiteral See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0101.html Discussion of this item started, we then jumped to item 13, (for most of the telecon), we then came back and completed this item. The initial discussion presented jjc's proposed definition of value space, duplicating: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0150 ** after discussion of item 13 15:15:00 <jjcscribe> back to value space of XMLLiteral discussion included XML equality is not hard, rather too easy, lots of answers. We had the requirement to have equality over XML. The specs of the consortium that had this were the c14n specs; so that's the basis of our design. JJC proposes, Jos seconds: "The value space of XML literals is a set of exclusively canonicalized XML" no abstentions, no opposition. RESOLVED 13: Post last call comment from I18N http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0025.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0023.html see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0132.html A lot of discussion (56 minutes). Highlights from IRC: I18N msg treatment of parseType="Literal" should be dependent on whether there is XML markup (excluding entities) inside string. DanC suggests folliowng I18N suggestion. A change to the parser - parseType="Literal" with no embedded mark-up generates plain literal. Can we reject this on the grounds of lateness? *is* XML a tree structure, or does in *encode* a tree structure Does distinguishing XML and non-XML conflict with not distinguishing text from an identical text? Consider <prop parseType="Literal">foo & bar </> vs <prop>foo & bar</> danc: the I18N group has not convinced RDF Core. I had this on an agenda with tim ... Is this information consistent with cannes? No, it is not. ACTION em get W3c mgmt feedback on I18N issue ACTION jjc Dig out cannes minutes ACTION danc give feedback to martin dürst 11: Datatypes types in concepts No discussion. Moved to e-mail. 12: Language identifier v language tag The concepts editors heard a preference for "tag". 14: Schedule http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0133.html primer aims to be ready 1st July concepts is ready syntax is, or will be ready schema waiting on peter a bit discussion of completeness claim in semantics discussion of normativity of entailment rules no one spoke in favour of dropping the entailment rules The chair proposed that closure rules remains in semantics doc and claim of completeness remains. However, no formal decision was made. 15: Responses to Owl comments Not reached. swebscrape:N3:python: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 14:05:27 UTC