- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:25:48 +0200
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
The breakout had IRC: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/rdfcore-i18n-irclog.html 09:03:47 <bwm> parseType=Literal 09:04:22 <bwm> in some way we want it to represent the abstract xml between the two tags. 09:04:55 <bwm> we need at least a bit to say that its xml 09:05:17 <bwm> represent the xml with a string that is the canonicalised represention xml 09:07:08 <bwm> the xml parser should do it right so we dont' have to do anything 09:10:17 <bwm> xml lang is inherited in xml - that is correctly handled by rdf/xml translation 09:12:09 <bwm> requirement is the graph round trips. misha happy. Note the last two words. parseType="Literal" does not show in the more formal minute: Also the following minutes are found in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/ [[ Notes from I18N/RDFCore Meeting I18N recommend that literals (strings) in the RDF graph be fully normalised UNICODE and should not start with a combining character. I18N suggests that IRI's be used to name resources in the graph and that comparison of IRI's behaves as if they are UNICODE normalised, but not does require that such normalization is performed. I18N agree that RDFCore requires a transitive string comparison algorithm and requests that the specs do not mislead application developers into thinking they are not permitted to implement a more flexible string matching algorithm, e.g. on queries. I18N note that the strings defining languages occasionally change and suggests that RDFCore may choose to use URI's to name languages. RDFCore agree to consider. I18N found the proposed solution of literals being a pair of a string and a language tag acceptable. I18N agree that n-triples is an internal tool for the WG and developers and is not subject to the same internationization concerns of more public syntaxes. I18N request that the specs make this limited role for n-triples clear. There was some dicussion of RDFCore concerns that I18N specs would not be final and of a lack of implementations delaying completion of RDFCore. ]]
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 14:26:10 UTC