- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:53:03 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'm agnostic about defining 'Arc'. But I do think the term 'node' is useful separately from the context of "nodes and arcs diagrams". #g -- At 12:47 05/06/03 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: >I am going through the editorial updates to the syntax WD and I got to: > > > Does the RDF series need to define "arc"? The original RDF syntax says > > quite a lot: "directed labeled graphs (also called 'nodes and arcs > > diagrams')" and defines arc in its glossary as "A representation of a > > property in a graph form; specifically the edges in a directed labeled > > graph." The new Concepts and Syntax specs mention yet do not seem to > > define arc. >-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0419.html > >We do define node (link to editors' draft dfn): > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#dfn-node > >but not arc. So can we talk about nodes & arcs pictures anymore? :) > >Dave ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 13:32:36 UTC