- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:47:43 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I am going through the editorial updates to the syntax WD and I got to: > Does the RDF series need to define "arc"? The original RDF syntax says > quite a lot: "directed labeled graphs (also called 'nodes and arcs > diagrams')" and defines arc in its glossary as "A representation of a > property in a graph form; specifically the edges in a directed labeled > graph." The new Concepts and Syntax specs mention yet do not seem to > define arc. -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0419.html We do define node (link to editors' draft dfn): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#dfn-node but not arc. So can we talk about nodes & arcs pictures anymore? :) Dave
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 07:49:19 UTC