- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:04:23 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>I am going through the editorial updates to the syntax WD and I got to: > >> Does the RDF series need to define "arc"? The original RDF syntax says >> quite a lot: "directed labeled graphs (also called 'nodes and arcs >> diagrams')" and defines arc in its glossary as "A representation of a >> property in a graph form; specifically the edges in a directed labeled >> graph." The new Concepts and Syntax specs mention yet do not seem to >> define arc. >-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0419.html > >We do define node (link to editors' draft dfn): > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#dfn-node > >but not arc. So can we talk about nodes & arcs pictures anymore? :) Suggestion: we can talk about node and arc PICTURES. The pictures do have arcs in them. The graphs, however, don't. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 10:04:27 UTC