Re: test failures

On 24 Jul 2003 13:40:22 +0100
Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> 
> These changes look right to me.  I'd like DaveB to confirm, ...


<snip>
> > > Of these 4 -17 are obsolete without looking.

Yes, bagID

> > > 1 is presumably an IRI that is not in NFC - now allowed, test is obsolete.

1 - yes, obsolete

> > > 2,3,18, 20  all have a bagID and should be obsolete

2 - yes, obsolete

3 - is testing containers.  The rdf:bagID could just
be removed from the rdf:Bag and the N-Triples corrected.

18 - yes, obsolete

20 - is testing rdf:nodeID on a rdf:Description.  The rdf:bagID
should be removed and the N-Triples corrected.

> > > 19 the ntriples file needs updating (no rdf:List)

yes

> > > 21 the ntriples file needs updating (no lang tag on XMLLiteral)

yes

> > >
> > > Hence I propose that the following tests should be obsoleted:
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) rdf-charmod-uris/Manifest.rdf#error001
> > > 2) rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/Manifest.rdf#test006
> > > 3) rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/Manifest.rdf#test0002
> > > 4) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test001
> > > 5) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test002
> > > 6) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > > 7) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test004
> > > 8) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test005
> > > 9) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test006
> > > 10) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test008
> > > 11) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test009
> > > 12) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test010a
> > > 13) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test010b
> > > 14) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test011a
> > > 15) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test011b
> > > 16) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test012a
> > > 17) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test012b
> > > 18) rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > > 20) rdfms-syntax-incomplete/Manifest.rdf#test003

all except 3 and 20 which need correcting.

> > > and to delete all the rdf:List triples in
> > > rdfms-seq-representation/test001.nt

yes

> > > and to delete the @fr from
> > > rdfms-xmllang/test002.nt

yes

(This is by inspection, I've not machine tested this).

Dave

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 09:08:21 UTC