- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 24 Jul 2003 14:07:08 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dave, Thanks for this. Looks good. In interests of simplicity, I suggest omitting the "maybe add"'s, unless anyone puts up a strong case to include them. Brian On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:45, Dave Beckett wrote: > This is from my action from RDFCore teleconference 2003-07-18 > > Intended to go in (latest version of) http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ > probably as a new subsection of section 5 "Global Issues" > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Global > (in editor's draft > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/#section-Global ) > > -------- > 5.X. Document Conformance (Normative) > > Definition: > An *RDF Document* is a serialization of an _RDF Graph_ > [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-rdf-graph ] > into a concrete syntax. > > Definition: > An *RDF/XML Document* is an _RDF Document_ written in the > recommended XML transfer syntax for RDF as defined in this document. > > Conformance: > An RDF/XML document is a conforming RDF/XML document if it adheres > to the specification defined in this document. > > ??Maybe add?? > .. and MUST NOT use any of rdf:bagID, rdf:aboutEach, > rdf:aboutEachPrefix or non-namespaced attributes. > > ??Maybe add?? > ... with no extensions. > > > All of the _Positive Parser Tests_ > [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#tc_org ] > in the _RDF Test Cases_ [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/ ] > are conforming RDF/XML documents. > > None of the _Negative Parser Tests_ > [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#tc_org ] > in the RDF Test Cases [ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/ ] > are conforming RDF/XML documents. > > > -------- > > I checked > QA Framework: Specification Guidelines > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-qaframe-spec-20030210/ > > for info. Conformance is mostly Guidelines 2 & 3. > > Dave
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 09:11:59 UTC