Re: test failures

These changes look right to me.  I'd like DaveB to confirm, but suggest
going ahead soon anyway.

Brian

On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 10:05, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> > I ran ARP against the test suite:
> >
> > lots of problems :(
> >
> > (21 failures)
> >
> > 1) rdf-charmod-uris/Manifest.rdf#error001
> > 2) rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/Manifest.rdf#test006
> > 3) rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/Manifest.rdf#test0002
> > 4) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test001
> > 5) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test002
> > 6) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > 7) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test004
> > 8) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test005
> > 9) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test006
> > 10) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test008
> > 11) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test009
> > 12) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test010a
> > 13) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test010b
> > 14) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test011a
> > 15) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test011b
> > 16) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test012a
> > 17) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test012b
> > 18) rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > 19) rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test001
> > 20) rdfms-syntax-incomplete/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > 21) rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test002
> >
> > Of these 4 -17 are obsolete without looking.
> > 1 is presumably an IRI that is not in NFC - now allowed, test is obsolete.
> > 2,3,18, 20  all have a bagID and should be obsolete
> > 19 the ntriples file needs updating (no rdf:List)
> > 21 the ntriples file needs updating (no lang tag on XMLLiteral)
> >
> > Hence I propose that the following tests should be obsoleted:
> >
> >
> > 1) rdf-charmod-uris/Manifest.rdf#error001
> > 2) rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/Manifest.rdf#test006
> > 3) rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/Manifest.rdf#test0002
> > 4) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test001
> > 5) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test002
> > 6) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > 7) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test004
> > 8) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test005
> > 9) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test006
> > 10) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test008
> > 11) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test009
> > 12) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test010a
> > 13) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test010b
> > 14) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test011a
> > 15) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test011b
> > 16) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test012a
> > 17) rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf#test012b
> > 18) rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/Manifest.rdf#test003
> > 20) rdfms-syntax-incomplete/Manifest.rdf#test003
> >
> > and to delete all the rdf:List triples in
> > rdfms-seq-representation/test001.nt
> >
> > and to delete the @fr from
> > rdfms-xmllang/test002.nt
> >
> >
> > Given the time presssures why don't we agree this by e-mail?
> 
> That sounds good to me.

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 08:43:08 UTC