- From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:35:52 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 12:07 PM 1/21/03 -0700, pat hayes wrote: >(The reason for this is the decision, taken rather late in the day, to >treat XML literals as a built-in datatype rather than a syntactically >distinct form of literal. Unfortunately this screws up the expository >structure of the document somewhat.) Hmmm... this makes me think this decision should have been made at editors' discretion, rather than as a group decision, since it is ultimately an expository matter, not one that (should) affect the meaning of any RDF. (Though I realize this decision involved coordination between two documents.) Which, looking forward, leads me to suggest that if Pat/Jeremy can agree on an alternative treatment that gives clearer exposition of the intended meaning, they should be allowed discretion to do so. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 09:28:03 UTC