- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:50:25 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
>
> (picking up on recent message in rdf-interest)
>
> Well, even before we have published the last call syntax spec we seem to
> have had four compliant parsers announced!
>
> I suspose it would be rude to publish a proprosed rec before the beginning
> of the last call period!
:)
Of course this is encouraging, but I'm not sure how many of them both
accept all the positive parser tests and fail all the negative ones
(which is my idea of compliant re rdf/xml parsing).
But the state so far is looking promising.
It seems like a good idea to collect some pointers. So far I've seen
announcements of conformance from:
ARP [1/2] Java, Jeremy Carroll
http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/arp
-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0059.html
Drive C#/.Net, Rahul Singh
http://www.daml.ri.cmu.edu/drive
-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0132.html
Raptor 0.9.7 C, Dave Beckett
http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/raptor/
-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Dec/0106.html
and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0013.html
rdflib 1.2.0 Python, Daniel Krech
http://rdflib.net/2003/01/02/rdflib-1.2.0/
RDF API for PHP 0.3 PHP, Chris Bizer
http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/rdfapi/
-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0062.html
SWI-Prolog Prolog, Jan Wielmaker
http://www.swi-prolog.org/packages/rdf2pl.html
-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0085.html
and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0043.html
Which is great since the majority are by non WG members ;)
There are likely to be others I'm sure.
Dave
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:51:41 UTC