- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:03:50 -0500
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 12:39, Jan Grant wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Eric Miller wrote: > > > > > From last Friday's RDF Core call, today looks like a target date. > > > > [[ > > Item: Document Status > > Primer DONE. > > Concepts: a couple of things arising today; can be ready Monday > > Syntax: as above. > > Semantics: as above. > > Schema: Reification action for today will be done Monday. > > Test cases: TC repo awaiting checking, actions from today, can be ready > > Monday > > ]] > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0215.html > > > > Primer and Syntax [1] seem to be done. Can i get a status update on > > the rest of the docs? I think it would be nice to have a little > > something for Brian when he returns :) > > I'm waiting on one thing. As I understand it, the value spaces of > xsd:integer and xsd:decimal no longer intersect. What?!?!?!?!? > If that is correct then > one datatype test case needs changing, since it currently suggests > otherwise. > > The test case is > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#semantic-equivalence-between-datatypes > > which says that > > [[ > eg:foo eg:bar "10"^^<xsd:integer> . > ]] > rdfs+dt(xsd:integer, xsd:decimal)-entails > [[ > eg:foo eg:bar "10.0"^^<xsd:decimal> . > ]] > > I'm waiting on a confirmation that this is, or is not, actually the > case, in light of recent xsd clarifications. > > Cheers, > jan -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 15:03:53 UTC