- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:05:30 -0400
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
(this could do with more ACTION archaeology, but in interests of it
being late rather than very late...) --dan
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Aug 15 2003 in America/New York duration 90 minutes
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Aug 15 2003 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
1. Selection of scribe (this week; next week's also sought)
Please could the minutes conform to:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html
2: Roll Call
Regrets from Mike Dean, Jos De Roo, Brian McBride.
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon 22 Aug 2003 1000 Boston Time (60 mins? 90 mins?)
5: Minutes of 08 Aug 2003 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0138.html
6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION 20030808#4 jjc to put together a proposal for XMLLiteral for \
joint WG and MD consumption.
closed with:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0163.html
(detailed text expected to WG before meeting)
ACTION 20030808#6 path to draft a sentence for alternative reification \
text to go into schema.
closed with:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0161.html
7: Misc Actions - Status
20030808#1 jang add <br/> test case (without html namespace)
20030808#2 daveb feedback to raiser wrt <br/> test case
20030808#3 pats draft an FAQ for XMLLiteral via rdf:parsetype= or rdf:datatype=
20030425#10 em carry xmlsch WG's offer of help wrt xmlsch-12
to semantic web coordination group
20030711#4 danc to get a test case for pfps-09 into OWL test
case doc
2003-08-01#4 jang: respond to daveR on his comments on testcases
8: pfps-11 - Reification vocab proposal
Towards closing pfps-11
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-11
context: dialog w/ Peter,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0014.html
and group decision last week not to accept his proposed rewording of
reification vocab description.
Pat's proposed text:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0161.html
Comments/concerns from Frank:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0171.html
Can we adopt some variant of Pat's proposal and action Schema editor to
propose an issue closure?
9: Implementation Report
Eric has been working on this. See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030331-advance
Msg from JJC regarding specific features (reification, collections)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0157.html
10: Denotation of rdf:XMLLiteral
see thread beginning:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0057.html
Proposal from jjc:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0163.html
Please review this, it would be good to decide tommorrow if we can.
[[
PROPOSE: accept the definition of rdf:XMLLiteral value space from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0452
and action concepts editors to integrate it in the editors draft, using
editorial discretion.
]]
11: I18N Update
I18N are objecting to our current (post-LC) design regarding language
tagging and XML literals.
B/G Reading:
Minutes I18N Core TF telcon, 2003-08-05
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0174.html
Summary from Richard Ishida
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-ig/2003Aug/0022
JJC's take on I18N concerns
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0156.html
12: Process - next step? CR/LC2/PR/etc.
In light of objection from I18N and associating highlighting of
changes in our (unpublished) specs post-LC, where does this leave our
'next stop PR' aspirations?
13: Document Status
- Primer
- Concepts
- Syntax
- Semantics
- Schema
- Test Cases
----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 16:05:30 UTC