- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:05:30 -0400
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
(this could do with more ACTION archaeology, but in interests of it being late rather than very late...) --dan Time: 10:00:00 Fri Aug 15 2003 in America/New York duration 90 minutes which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Aug 15 2003 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore 1. Selection of scribe (this week; next week's also sought) Please could the minutes conform to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html 2: Roll Call Regrets from Mike Dean, Jos De Roo, Brian McBride. 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon 22 Aug 2003 1000 Boston Time (60 mins? 90 mins?) 5: Minutes of 08 Aug 2003 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0138.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION 20030808#4 jjc to put together a proposal for XMLLiteral for \ joint WG and MD consumption. closed with: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0163.html (detailed text expected to WG before meeting) ACTION 20030808#6 path to draft a sentence for alternative reification \ text to go into schema. closed with: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0161.html 7: Misc Actions - Status 20030808#1 jang add <br/> test case (without html namespace) 20030808#2 daveb feedback to raiser wrt <br/> test case 20030808#3 pats draft an FAQ for XMLLiteral via rdf:parsetype= or rdf:datatype= 20030425#10 em carry xmlsch WG's offer of help wrt xmlsch-12 to semantic web coordination group 20030711#4 danc to get a test case for pfps-09 into OWL test case doc 2003-08-01#4 jang: respond to daveR on his comments on testcases 8: pfps-11 - Reification vocab proposal Towards closing pfps-11 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-11 context: dialog w/ Peter, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0014.html and group decision last week not to accept his proposed rewording of reification vocab description. Pat's proposed text: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0161.html Comments/concerns from Frank: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0171.html Can we adopt some variant of Pat's proposal and action Schema editor to propose an issue closure? 9: Implementation Report Eric has been working on this. See: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030331-advance Msg from JJC regarding specific features (reification, collections) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0157.html 10: Denotation of rdf:XMLLiteral see thread beginning: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0057.html Proposal from jjc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0163.html Please review this, it would be good to decide tommorrow if we can. [[ PROPOSE: accept the definition of rdf:XMLLiteral value space from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0452 and action concepts editors to integrate it in the editors draft, using editorial discretion. ]] 11: I18N Update I18N are objecting to our current (post-LC) design regarding language tagging and XML literals. B/G Reading: Minutes I18N Core TF telcon, 2003-08-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0174.html Summary from Richard Ishida http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-ig/2003Aug/0022 JJC's take on I18N concerns http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0156.html 12: Process - next step? CR/LC2/PR/etc. In light of objection from I18N and associating highlighting of changes in our (unpublished) specs post-LC, where does this leave our 'next stop PR' aspirations? 13: Document Status - Primer - Concepts - Syntax - Semantics - Schema - Test Cases ----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 16:05:30 UTC