- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:55:46 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Brian McBride wrote:
> At 09:20 30/04/2003 -0400, Frank Manola wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> "It is trivial to restore the triples for anyone who wants them fro a
>> graph without them, using
>> { ?x rdf:first ?y } => { ?x a rdf:List }."
>>
>> Or rather, whether this is true *in RDF* (as opposed to in OWL).
>
>
> I'm assuming that rdf:first has an rdfs:domain of rdf:List so it would
> be true in RDFS. Yes/No?
I believe it would be true in RDFS as well (one of the reasons why it's
a semantic extension). I'd need to make that distinction (since when
the Primer discusses collections is hasn't gotten to Schema yet).
--Frank
--
Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 09:38:05 UTC