- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:30:26 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Dan Connolly said: > I suppose I could follow all these URIs and such, but > could we talk in code a little less, please? You objected to preserving something you are recorded as the author of in DAML+OIL, i.e. the <node> rdf:type rdf:List . triples in the DAML collections (now RDF collections) design. I assume you are representing Tim's original comment and W3C so I primarily need information from others to get a way to resolve the for/against/abstain tie in the last teclon or new information from webont. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:32:15 UTC