W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: timbl-03

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 29 Apr 2003 14:07:25 -0500
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1051643245.6595.99.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 13:50, Dave Beckett wrote:
> Given where we got to on timbl-03
> from the draft minutes in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0361.html
> [[
>   PROPOSED: to reject timbl-03 according to
> 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0262.html
>   Prop DaveB; Second JanG;
>   For: ILRT; Against: W3C, PatH; Abstain: FrankM, MikeD.
> ]]
> I mentioned at the time that Jeremy said he'd prefer supporting what
> PFPS said, who rejected it, so that would be nearly 2 for/against/abstain
> [[
>   DanC pointed out the cost would be changes to Syntax, Test Cases,
> 	Primer(?)
>   ACTION 20030425#4 frank figure out the cost to PRIMER of accepting timbl-03
>   ACTION 20030425#5 danc figure out the cost to WebOnt of accepting timbl-03
> ]]
> Since I own it, I need some help in resolving this. The earlier the
> better since this is the last remaining open syntax issue and I want
> to get a new draft updated.
> As long as PFPS objects to this change, I'm puzzled as to how to
> resolve it, but that's more information I hope to get soon.  If he
> says changing has no terrible consequences, I'll propose dropping it.
> Still looks like it'll need several WDs changing
> Those of you who used or were involved in creating DAML+OIL
> from the Authors list on http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html
>   W3C - TimBL, DanC, danbri
>   PatH
>   MikeD
> why does your organisation now object or abstain to keeping it the same?

Frankly, I have no idea what you're talking about.

I suppose I could follow all these URIs and such, but
could we talk in code a little less, please?

> Thanks
> Dave
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:07:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:22 UTC