- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:53:30 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 19:26 29/04/2003 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > >>>Jan Grant said: > >... > > > Item 13: xmlsch-12 > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0274.html > >I proposed to postpone it in this message. > > > With amendment: strike "sucks because". > > With amendment: "the WG notes your offer of help and has asked the > > coordination group to carry it forward" > > PROPOSED to reject xmlsch-12 as detailed above > > prop daveb; second path; against 0; abstain 0 > > RESOLVED > >This is recorded as a resolution to reject. > > > > > ACTION 20030425#9 bwm postponed issue for xmlsch-12 (is it the same as > for -10?) > >This action hints it must have been a postponement. I believe that is correct. [...] >PS (I need the postponed issue assigned URI before I can respond to >xmlsch-10 or this) There was one already that I've used http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf I have updated it to refer to the xml last call comments. Thanks for the reminder. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 14:52:57 UTC