- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:34:25 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I imagine the chair would like some discussion of the concepts issues on Friday, and I note that I will not be present. I believe I have now executed on my action to bring proposals to close four (in fact five) concepts issues: xmlsch-01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0247.html xmlsch-02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0219.html xmlsch-03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0230.html danc-02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0210.html pfps-13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0248.html For all of these, except danc-02, I would be happy for the group to make whatever decision in my absence. With danc-02 I would be happy tor the group to agree with me in my absence ! (but won't be surprised if that does not happen). I believe there are subtle interactions here. I note that Pat or Frank seemed close to making a counterproposal on xmlsch-03 lexical mapping - maybe that could be carried Friday. (I think the proposal is to use the term 'lexical-to-value mapping' throughout) I note that Patrick endorsed one of the positions I described on xmlsch-02 (whitespace), maybe he could move that as an issue resolution. I will not be surprised to hear back from the group that you want adjusted proposals on some of these issues. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 08:34:10 UTC