- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:04:36 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
PROPOSE: Reject this issue - the text is self-consistent. History (rewritten): Dan [1] says: [[ specification of literals is goofy... "A literal in an RDF graph contains three components called: ... The datatype URI being an RDF URI reference. ... A plain literal is one in which the datatype URI is absent." Hello? you just told me every literal has one. Specify that the datatype URI and language identifier are optional. ]] I replied [2]: **** I wanted to check that you had seen the line in that subsection: [[ The lexical form is present in all RDF literals; the language identifier and the datatype URI may be absent from an RDF literal. ]] ***** Dan replied [3]: [[ Ah, no, in fact, I didn't see that. I suppose that's sufficient, but... ]] However, I had discussed other options, which was with hindsight a mistake. Since Dan sees the current text as sufficient I see no reason to change it. Jeremy [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0112.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0120.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0121.html
Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 14:04:15 UTC